data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc322/fc322aa0bb1ba570c128a34f978c0f598c2dd39b" alt="Manta venture communications llc 79452"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16e6c/16e6c04c2dcc2f8cc08f9a2bb35321263a88e36f" alt="manta venture communications llc 79452 manta venture communications llc 79452"
§ 61.26(a)(1) (defining a "competitive local exchange carrier" as a local exchange carrier that provides some or all of the interstate exchange access services used to send traffic to or from an 1 Doc. ^ A competitive local exchange carrier is a telecommunications company that competes with established carriers, usually incumbent local exchange carriers in the area. § 251(h)(1)(defining an "incumbent local exchange carrier" st$ the local exchange carrier that provided telephone exchange service with respect to an area as of February, 8, 1996 and was a member pr the successor or assign of a member of the exchange carrier association as of February 8, 1996). James Valley is also an incumbent local exchange carrier, while Northern Valley is a competitive local exchange carrier.^ ' An incumbent local exchange carrier is a telecommunications company that provided local service before the passage ofthe Telecommunications Act of 1996,Pub. Venture is an incumbent local exchange carrier^ that provides voice and broadband services in rural South Dakota. ("Venture") sued Defendants James Valley Cooperative Telephone Company("James Valley")and Northern Valley Communications, LLC ("Northern Valley"). Plaintiff Venture Communications Cooperative, Inc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10aed/10aed30974c3259ebf842f6be0a935a1fa9b2caf" alt="manta venture communications llc 79452 manta venture communications llc 79452"
JAMES VALLEY COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE COMPANY,and NORTHERN VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Defendants. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION 3:20-CV-3011-RAL VENTURE COMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE,INC., Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS vs. James Valley Cooperative Telephone Company et al Doc.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc322/fc322aa0bb1ba570c128a34f978c0f598c2dd39b" alt="Manta venture communications llc 79452"